From one release a month to five
The problem
Every game had to be checked by a person playing it, all the way through. That is slow, it misses the things nobody thought to try, and it is the reason a small studio ships one title a month instead of five. Testing, not building, was setting the release schedule.
The insight
The build was never the slow part — proving it worked was
It is tempting to speed up development itself. But the bottleneck sat after the work was finished: someone had to play the whole thing to find out whether it shipped. Once that checking happened automatically — every level, every change, in seconds — releases stopped waiting on somebody's afternoon, and the constraint moved back to design, where it belongs.
What we built
- Automated play-through checks that run after every change, in place of manual testing
- Levels verified as completable before they can be published at all
- A repeatable release process, from build to store page to trailer
- A shared foundation so a new title starts from proven work rather than a blank page
Got something eating your team's week?
Describe it and you will get a straight answer about whether we can help and what it would take.
Start a conversation